Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A UK Multicenter Real-world Analysis on Efficacy, Safety, Predictive and Prognostic Factors.

BACKGROUND: The orally administered combination trifluridine/tipiracil has been approved as third line treatment in mCRC, demonstrating survival benefit and acceptable toxicity profile in the phase III RECOURSE study. PATIENT AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective real-world analysis of patients with mCRC receiving trifluridine/tipiracil between 2016 and 2019 in eight cancer centers across the United Kingdom. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were included with median age of 69 years. All patients had received at least 2 lines of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy doublet with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. About 10% of patients had ECOG ≥ 2. Median duration of trifluridine/tipiracil treatment was 3 months with an ORR of 2.1% and disease control rate of 21.6%. Median OS was 7.6 and median PFS 3.3 months. A dose reduction was required in 27% of patients, while 7.6% discontinued treatment due to toxicity. The most common grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (34%), fatigue (10%), anemia (9%) and febrile neutropenia (5%). Baseline NLR <5 and CEA <200 had favorable prognostic (HR: 0.52 and 0.39, P≤ .001) and predictive value (OR: 4.1 and 6.7, P< .05). Development of grade 3 neutropenia predicted treatment response (OR: 0.32, P< .001). Following treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil 41% were referred for phase I trial or rechallenged with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Trifluridine/tipiracil is well tolerated in refractory mCRC patients with comparable efficacy and toxicity profile to that of the phase III RECOURSE. Pretreatment NLR and CEA could serve as potential markers for patient selection, while treatment-induced grade 3 neutropenia predicted response. Prospective validation is needed.

A prospective audit on the use of prophylactic antiemetics and rates of CINV in patients receiving carboplatin AUC≥4 or combination anthracycline-cyclophosphamide.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are two of the most frequently experienced and distressing side effects of cancer treatment. Recent updates by ESMO/MASCC and ASCO on guidelines for prevention of CINV have recommended the addition of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist to antiemetic regimens for patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy area under the curve (AUC) ≥4 mg/mL per minute, and an addition of olanzapine for those receiving combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. AIMS: To assess current use of prophylactic antiemetics and rates of CINV in patients under the care of MidCentral Regional Cancer Treatment Service (MRCTS) receiving carboplatin AUC≥4 or combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide. METHODS: Data was prospectively collected on patients under the care of MRCTS receiving carboplatin AUC≥4 or combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, including breast cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and lymphoma patients receiving rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). Questionnaires were given to eligible patients to be completed daily from day two to day six of first cycle of chemotherapy only. Data on each patient's gender, age, types of chemotherapies, types of malignancies, presence of nausea or vomiting, number of dry retching or vomiting episodes and anti-emetics were recorded. RESULTS: From 15 September 2018 to 10 August 2019, a total of 44 patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy AUC≥4 and 30 patients receiving combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide were included. Twenty-two patients (50%) had either emesis or significant nausea in the overall and delayed phase when treated with carboplatin AUC≥4, and only three (7%) in the acute phase. Fourteen patients (56%) had either emesis or significant nausea in the overall phase when treated with FEC chemotherapy, mostly in the acute phase (13 patients) rather than in the delayed phase (9 patients). CONCLUSION: The rates of CINV are high with the existing antiemetic regimens used at MidCentral Regional Cancer Treatment Service. Therefore, in accordance with international guidelines, we will add a neurokinin-1 antagonist to the antiemetic regimens for patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy AUC≥4, and olanzapine for those receiving combination anthracycline/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, in an attempt to improve the rates of CINV in these groups. Repeating this audit post-implementation of above recommendations will be important to assess for any improvement.

Sickness presenteeism in a New Zealand hospital.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the attitudes of hospital clinical staff to acute personal illness. METHODS: A self-reported questionnaire was developed. Four hundred clinical staff employed by the district health board (DHB) who met the inclusion criteria who were randomly selected. Data were collected and analysed using SPSS software. Ethical approval was obtained from the Lower South Regional Ethics Committee and from the DHB Health Research Office. RESULTS: Doctors were more likely to exhibit sickness presenteeism (SP)--i.e. working despite being sick--than any other occupational group at the DHB. Two main reasons were given for not taking sick leave: staff did not believe they were unwell enough to justify taking leave and they did not want to increase the workload of others. The majority of study participants would not contact anyone for advice about whether to take leave. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that SP, especially in doctors, is prevalent in the DHB and is similar to findings from elsewhere. Low rates of clinical staff contacting someone for advice on coming to work whilst ill could be targeted to improve infection control.